- Oct 7, 2025
- Riding Since
- 2025
Hi everyone,
I'm hoping to get some advice from the community about a recent oil change experience on my 2016 CBR650F.
My bike has just under 50,000 km, and I recently took it to a local mechanic for an oil change. I switched to Liqui Moly 10W-40 Street. However, I later found out he had put in 3.4 liters of oil, even with a filter change. As we know, the manual specifies 2.9 liters.
Unfortunately, I had already ridden the bike for over 100 km before I realized the mistake.
Here's the part that I need your opinion on. When I spoke to the mechanic about it, he gave me a very strange excuse. He claimed that high-mileage engines (like mine with ~49,000 km) require more oil to compensate for wear and tear. He even had a "sliding scale" he uses:
So, my two main questions are:
I'm hoping to get some advice from the community about a recent oil change experience on my 2016 CBR650F.
My bike has just under 50,000 km, and I recently took it to a local mechanic for an oil change. I switched to Liqui Moly 10W-40 Street. However, I later found out he had put in 3.4 liters of oil, even with a filter change. As we know, the manual specifies 2.9 liters.
Unfortunately, I had already ridden the bike for over 100 km before I realized the mistake.
Here's the part that I need your opinion on. When I spoke to the mechanic about it, he gave me a very strange excuse. He claimed that high-mileage engines (like mine with ~49,000 km) require more oil to compensate for wear and tear. He even had a "sliding scale" he uses:
- 3000km = 2.7L
- 10000km = 2.9L
- 20000km = 3.2L
- and so on...
So, my two main questions are:
- Is there any logic or truth at all to what this mechanic is saying about adding more oil for high-mileage engines? Or is this complete nonsense?
- By riding for over 100 km with that much excess oil, what potential damage should I be on the lookout for? is there anything else I should be concerned about (seals, gaskets, etc.)?
